TOPICS·SUPPLY CHAIN·EU DIRECTIVE 2024/1760

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

The EU's landmark directive requiring large companies to identify, prevent, and mitigate adverse human rights and environmental impacts across their entire value chains -- significantly narrowed by the Omnibus I simplification package in March 2026.

EUDIRECTIVEOMNIBUS I AMENDED1224 regulations trackedUpdated April 2026
THE ESSENTIALS

The EU has passed a law that makes large companies legally responsible for human rights abuses and environmental damage in their supply chains. If a company sells clothes made in a factory with unsafe working conditions, or sources minerals from a mine that poisons local water, the company at the top of that chain can now face fines and legal consequences -- even if it did not cause the harm directly.

This law is called the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, or CSDDD. It was adopted in 2024 but then significantly scaled back in early 2026 through the "Omnibus I" simplification package, which entered into force on 18 March 2026. The result: far fewer companies are now covered (roughly 4,000 instead of 13,000), the maximum penalty dropped from 5% to 3% of worldwide turnover, and the timeline was pushed back. Member states must write the directive into national law by July 2028, and companies must comply from July 2029. The obligation to publish an annual due diligence statement applies to financial years starting on or after 1 January 2030.

In practice, the directive requires companies to actively look for problems in their supply chains -- things like forced labour, child labour, deforestation, or toxic pollution -- and take concrete steps to stop or prevent them. They must set up a complaints channel, monitor whether their efforts are working, and report publicly on what they found and what they did about it. The original directive also required companies to adopt a climate transition plan, but Omnibus I removed that obligation entirely, aligning climate planning with the separate CSRD reporting framework.

Several countries already had their own versions of this law. France has required large companies to publish a "vigilance plan" since 2017. Germany introduced its own supply chain law (LkSG) in 2023, but the new coalition government has agreed to repeal it and replace it with a leaner national implementation of the CSDDD. Once transposed, the directive will replace these national laws with a single EU-wide standard -- though civil liability for non-compliance will be governed by each country's own legal system, not by a harmonised EU regime.

What
EU directive requiring companies to conduct human rights and environmental due diligence across their value chains. Adopted 2024, substantially amended by Omnibus I in March 2026 with narrower scope, reduced penalties, and extended timeline.
Who
EU companies with 5,000+ employees and EUR 1.5B+ net worldwide turnover. Non-EU companies with EUR 1.5B+ EU-generated turnover. Approximately 4,000 companies directly in scope (down from ~13,000).
When
Member States must transpose by 26 July 2028. Companies must comply from 26 July 2029 -- a single application date, replacing the original phased rollout. Annual due diligence reporting applies to financial years starting on or after 1 January 2030.
Penalty
Maximum fines of 3% of net worldwide turnover (reduced from 5% by Omnibus I). Civil liability governed by national law rather than an EU-harmonised regime. Supervisory authorities in each member state will enforce compliance.

On 18 March 2026, the Omnibus I simplification package entered into force, fundamentally reshaping the CSDDD. The changes reduce scope by approximately 70%, extend the timeline, and shift civil liability to national law.

DIMENSION
ORIGINAL CSDDD (2024)
POST-OMNIBUS I (2026)
EU company threshold
1,000+ employees AND EUR 450M+ turnover
5,000+ employees AND EUR 1.5B+ turnover
Non-EU company threshold
EUR 450M+ EU turnover
EUR 1.5B+ EU turnover
Estimated companies in scope
~13,000
~4,000 (70% reduction)
Maximum financial penalty
5% of net worldwide turnover
3% of net worldwide turnover
Civil liability
EU-harmonised regime (Article 29)
National law governs liability
Climate transition plan
Mandatory (Article 22)
Removed (aligned with CSRD)
Transposition deadline
26 July 2026
26 July 2028
Application date
Phased 2027-2029
26 July 2029 (single date)

The CSDDD applies based on two cumulative thresholds: employee headcount and net worldwide turnover. Both conditions must be met simultaneously.

< EUR 1.5B turnover
EUR 1.5B+ turnover
5,000+ employees
WATCH LIST
Meets employee threshold only. Not in scope, but monitor national laws and future amendments.
IN SCOPE
Both thresholds met. Full CSDDD obligations apply from July 2029.
< 5,000 employees
OUT OF SCOPE
Below both thresholds. May still be affected as supplier to in-scope companies.
WATCH LIST
Meets turnover threshold only. Not in scope, but may face contractual pass-down.
Non-EU companies: In scope if generating EUR 1.5B+ in turnover within the EU, regardless of global employee count. The employee threshold applies only to EU-incorporated companies.

The CSDDD follows the OECD Due Diligence Guidance framework, requiring companies to implement a continuous cycle of six interconnected steps.

Embed human rights and environmental due diligence into corporate policies, risk management systems, and governance structures. Board-level oversight is required.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLES
Adopt a due diligence policy approved by the board
Assign internal responsibility and budget
Train relevant staff on due diligence procedures
This is a continuous cycle, not a one-time exercise. Companies must reassess and update their due diligence at least annually and whenever significant changes occur in their operations or value chain.

While the CSDDD applies across all sectors, the following industries carry heightened risk for adverse human rights and environmental impacts in their supply chains.

Textiles & GarmentsCRITICAL RISK
Forced labour, child labour, unsafe working conditions, water pollution, excessive overtime
Mining & MineralsCRITICAL RISK
Conflict minerals, environmental destruction, community displacement, occupational health hazards
Agriculture & FoodCRITICAL RISK
Deforestation, land grabbing, pesticide exposure, migrant worker exploitation, biodiversity loss
Electronics & TechnologyHIGH RISK
Cobalt and rare earth mining conditions, e-waste dumping, factory labour conditions in Southeast Asia
Construction & InfrastructureHIGH RISK
Migrant worker exploitation, sand mining impacts, unsafe sites, subcontractor labour violations
Chemicals & PharmaceuticalsHIGH RISK
Hazardous waste discharge, worker exposure to toxic substances, clinical trial ethics, API sourcing
Forestry & PaperHIGH RISK
Illegal logging, indigenous rights violations, deforestation, biodiversity loss
Transport & LogisticsHIGH RISK
Driver exploitation, emissions pollution, ship-breaking labour conditions, port worker safety

The CSDDD does not exist in isolation. It connects to a dense network of EU sustainability regulations, each adding sector-specific or topic-specific requirements.

RELATIONSHIPReporting framework
CSRD requires sustainability reporting that draws on the same data as CSDDD due diligence. Omnibus I aligned both frameworks so CSRD reporting satisfies CSDDD disclosure obligations.

Several EU member states adopted national supply chain due diligence laws before the CSDDD. Once transposed, the directive will supersede these national laws for companies in scope of both.

FRFranceACTIVE
Loi de Vigilance (Duty of Vigilance Law) (2017)
Scope: 5,000+ employees (France) or 10,000+ (worldwide)
DEGermanySUPERSEDED 2029
Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz (LkSG) (2023)
Scope: 1,000+ employees (coalition agreed to repeal; replacement via CSDDD transposition)
NLNetherlandsACTIVE
Wet Zorgplicht Kinderarbeid (Child Labour Due Diligence Act) (2019)
Scope: All companies selling to Dutch consumers (adopted but never entered into force)
NONorwayACTIVE
Transparency Act (Apenhetsloven) (2022)
Scope: Large and mid-size enterprises

Supply chain due diligence has rapidly evolved from a voluntary best practice into a binding legal obligation across both the European Union and the United States. At the centre of the EU framework is the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), adopted in 2024, which requires large companies to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for adverse human rights and environmental impacts throughout their value chains. On the US side, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act and related measures prohibit imports of goods produced with forced labour, reflecting a parallel but enforcement-driven approach.

The CSDDD was significantly amended by the Omnibus I simplification package, adopted by the EU Council on 24 February 2026 and entering into force on 18 March 2026. The revised scope applies only to EU companies with more than 5,000 employees and net worldwide turnover exceeding 1.5 billion euros, as well as non-EU companies generating more than 1.5 billion euros in EU turnover -- a roughly 70% reduction in scope from the original directive. The transposition deadline has been extended to 26 July 2028, with companies required to comply from 26 July 2029.

Key obligations under the CSDDD include integrating due diligence into corporate policies, identifying actual and potential adverse impacts, taking appropriate measures to prevent or mitigate those impacts, establishing and maintaining a complaints mechanism, monitoring effectiveness, and publicly reporting on due diligence activities. The Omnibus I package removed the EU-harmonised civil liability regime, leaving liability to be governed primarily by national law, and reduced the maximum financial penalty from 5% to 3% of net worldwide turnover. The climate transition plan obligation was also removed, aligning with changes made to the CSRD.

In the United States, the emphasis has been on trade enforcement. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act creates a rebuttable presumption that goods from China's Xinjiang region are produced with forced labour and thus banned from import. US Customs and Border Protection enforces this through Withhold Release Orders and entity lists. Companies importing into the US must map their supply chains and demonstrate that goods are free from forced labour to avoid seizure at the border.

These supply chain frameworks interact extensively with other regulations. The EUDR adds deforestation-specific due diligence for commodities, while the EU Battery Regulation requires supply chain due diligence for battery raw materials. CSRD reporting obligations overlap with CSDDD due diligence disclosures, and the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive supports the complaints mechanisms that CSDDD requires. For businesses, the convergence of these requirements demands integrated compliance strategies that address human rights, environmental, and trade obligations across global supply chains.

Apr 23, 2026
YOU ARE HERE
01
Due diligence policy
Integrate human rights and environmental due diligence into corporate governance policies and strategy.
02
Impact identification
Map your value chain to identify actual and potential adverse human rights and environmental impacts.
03
Prevention and mitigation
Take appropriate measures to prevent potential adverse impacts and bring actual impacts to an end.
04
Complaints mechanism
Establish accessible grievance channels for affected persons, workers, and civil society organisations.
05
Climate transition plan
Adopt and implement a Paris Agreement-aligned transition plan with emission reduction targets.
06
Public reporting
Publish annual statements on due diligence activities, findings, and measures taken.

Select your company type for tailored compliance guidance.

KEY OBLIGATIONS
Map supply chain for hardware, data centres, and component sourcing
Assess human rights risks in electronics manufacturing supply chains
Establish a complaints mechanism accessible to affected stakeholders
Integrate due diligence into procurement policies and contracts
YOUR FIRST STEP

Map your hardware and infrastructure supply chain to identify tier-1 and tier-2 suppliers in high-risk regions

JUR.TITLESTATUSLINKS
EUCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2003 of 8 September 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use itemsadopted3
EUCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/2547 of 5 September 2024 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use itemsadopted2
EUCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2616 of 15 September 2023 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use itemsadopted2
EUCommission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/996 of 23 February 2023 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use itemsadopted2
EUCorrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/2003 of 8 September 2025 amending Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of dual-use items (OJ L, 2025/2003, 14.11.2025)adopted1
EUCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/198 of 28 January 2026 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2239 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain utility scale steel wind towers originating in the People’s Republic of Chinaadopted1
EUCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2320 of 18 November 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/633 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of monosodium glutamate originating in the People’s Republic of China and in Indonesia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Counciladopted1
EUCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2149 of 24 October 2025 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1976 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of mono ethylene glycol originating in the United States of America and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabiaadopted1
EUCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/738 of 1 March 2024 withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers, amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 and repealing the Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of Chinaadopted1
EUCommission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180 of 16 October 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, following a new exporter review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Counciladopted1